Thursday, July 31, 2025

The French Revolution

 

The French Revolution


Inaugural session of the Estates General (May 5, 1789)



Stages of the French Revolution

Top Questions

1. What were the causes of the Reign of Terror?

Prior to the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror (1793–94), France was governed by the National Convention. Power in this assembly was divided between the more moderate Girondins, who sought a constitutional monarchy and economic liberalism and favored spreading the Revolution throughout Europe by means of war, and the Montagnards, who preferred a policy of radical egalitarianism. By the spring of 1793, the war was going badly, and France found itself surrounded by hostile powers while counterrevolutionary insurrections were spreading outward from the Vendée. A combination of food scarcity and rising prices led to the overthrow of the Girondins and increased the popular support of the Montagnards, who created the Committee of Public Safety to deal with the various crises. On September 5, 1793, the Convention decreed that “terror is the order of the day” and resolved that opposition to the Revolution needed to be crushed and eliminated so that the Revolution could succeed.

2.What major events took place during the Reign of Terror?

Laws were passed that defined those who should be arrested as counterrevolutionaries, and committees of surveillance were set up to identify suspects and issue arrest warrants. Later laws suspended the rights of suspects to both legal assistance and public trials and mandated execution of all those who were found guilty. Other laws set up government control of prices, confiscated lands from those found guilty of failing to support the Revolution, and brought public assistance to the poor and disabled. The French republican calendar was adopted as part of a program of de-Christianization. About 300,000 people were arrested, and 17,000 of them were tried and executed. As many as 23,000 more were killed without trial or died in prison. However, conscription raised a large army that turned the tide of the war in France’s favor.

 

3.How did the Reign of Terror end?

Maximilien Robespierre, president of the Jacobin Club, was also president of the National Convention and was the most prominent member of the Committee of Public Safety; many credited him with near dictatorial power. The excesses of the Reign of Terror combined with the decreased threat from other countries led to increased opposition to the Committee of Public Safety and to Robespierre himself. In July 1794 Robespierre was arrested and executed as were many of his fellow Jacobins, thereby ending the Reign of Terror, which was succeeded by the Thermidorian Reaction.

 

At the end of the 18th century, the Ancien Régime was faltering in France. Ignoring the changing times and unable to manage socioeconomic transformations, the monarchy continued to exercise its absolute power, consolidating and perpetuating the injustices and inequalities of feudal society. Due to the privileges of the nobility and the clergy, peasants were forced to bear the brunt of the tax burden. Since the middle of the century, however, Enlightenment intellectuals such as Montesquieu, Voltaire, and Rousseau had undermined the legitimacy of monarchical absolutism by formulating political principles (popular sovereignty, equality before the law, separation of powers) that were embraced by the bourgeoisie, an emerging social class that aspired to see its economic power reflected in the legal system.

 


 


Inaugural Session of the Estates General (May 5, 1789)

The immediate triggers of the French Revolution (1789-1799) were the country's financial bankruptcy and poor harvests, which generated widespread poverty and hunger. To resolve the state's serious economic and financial crisis, King Louis XVI convened the Estates General in May 1789, an assembly that brought together, separately, representatives of the three estates (the nobility, the clergy, and the people, or "Third Estate").

 

The Popular Revolt and the National Assembly (1789-1791)



 

The representatives of the Third Estate, led by the bourgeoisie, demanded the replacement of the traditional voting system (one vote per estate) with the individual vote. Faced with the rejection of their demands and the hesitant stance of the monarchy, they formed the National Assembly, proclaiming it the true repository of national sovereignty and inviting representatives of the other estates to join them. The members of the National Assembly, gathered in the Tennis Hall, swore on June 20, 1789, not to disband until they had given France a constitution.


 

The Storming of the Bastille (July 14, 1789)

Fearing that the king would dissolve the Assembly by force, the popular classes stormed the Bastille on July 14, a fortress that served as a prison and was a symbol of the absolutist monarchy. The French Revolution had begun and soon spread to other cities and rural areas, where the anti-seigneurial revolt known as "the Great Fear" broke out.

 

On August 4, 1789, the National Assembly, now the National Constituent Assembly, decreed the abolition of all feudal rights and privileges, and on August 26, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen was published, based on the principles of "liberty, equality, and fraternity." Dominated by the more moderate sectors of the bourgeoisie, the Assembly developed extensive legislative work that culminated in the approval of the Constitution of 1791, which established popular sovereignty and the separation of executive, legislative, and judicial powers.

 

The new order established France as a constitutional monarchy and combined the revolutionary achievements with respect for the king: the monarch and his ministers would retain executive power. Legislative power would be vested in the Legislative Assembly, whose members would be elected by census suffrage, as would the judges and members of the courts.

Arrest of the royal family at Varennes (June 21, 1791) 


Royal family return to Paris after trying to escape July 1791


Execution Louis 16


Antoinette

 

The constitutional process was not without difficulties, particularly in its final phase. While pretending to accept the reforms, Louis XVI secretly negotiated an intervention by foreign absolutist monarchies to end the revolution, and in June 1791, he staged a failed escape attempt that unleashed strong anti-monarchist sentiment. In July, the National Guard, a force created by the revolutionaries, had to violently suppress a republican demonstration on the Champ de Mars. In August, the kings of Austria and Prussia issued veiled threats of intervention. Nevertheless, the revolution continued: after the calling and holding of elections, the Legislative Assembly began its sessions on October 1, 1791.

 

The Constitutional Monarchy: The Legislative Assembly (1791-1792)

 

Subjected to intense pressure, the newly established constitutional monarchy would have little effect: it did not even survive a year. Although the Legislative Assembly enacted progressive measures, it was unable to satisfy the discontent of the working classes.

Fearing that the king would dissolve the Assembly by force, the popular classes stormed the Bastille on July 14, a fortress that served as a prison and was a symbol of the absolutist monarchy. The French Revolution had begun and soon spread to other cities and rural areas, where the anti-seigneurial revolt known as "the Great Fear" broke out.

 

On August 4, 1789, the National Assembly, now the National Constituent Assembly, decreed the abolition of all feudal rights and privileges, and on August 26, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen was published, based on the principles of "liberty, equality, and fraternity." Dominated by the more moderate sectors of the bourgeoisie, the Assembly developed extensive legislative work that culminated in the approval of the Constitution of 1791, which established popular sovereignty and the separation of executive, legislative, and judicial powers.

 

The new order established France as a constitutional monarchy and combined the revolutionary achievements with respect for the king: the monarch and his ministers would retain executive power. Legislative power would be vested in the Legislative Assembly, whose members would be elected by census suffrage, as would the judges and members of the courts.

 


 

The constitutional process was not without difficulties, particularly in its final phase. While pretending to accept the reforms, Louis XVI secretly negotiated an intervention by foreign absolutist monarchies to end the revolution, and in June 1791, he staged a failed escape attempt that unleashed strong anti-monarchist sentiment. In July, the National Guard, a force created by the revolutionaries, had to violently suppress a republican demonstration on the Champ de Mars. In August, the kings of Austria and Prussia issued veiled threats of intervention. Nevertheless, the revolution continued: after the calling and holding of elections, the Legislative Assembly began its sessions on October 1, 1791.

 

The Constitutional Monarchy: The Legislative Assembly (1791-1792)

 

Subject to intense pressure, the newly established constitutional monarchy would have little effect: it did not even survive a year. Although the Legislative Assembly enacted progressive measures, it was unable to satisfy the discontent of the working classes over the high cost of basic goods resulting from the worsening economic crisis.

Abroad, faced with the danger posed by the spread of revolutionary ideas to the rest of Europe, an alliance of absolutist forces (Austria and Prussia) was organized and entered into war with France on April 20, 1792. Successive defeats of the French armies radicalized the situation; the Jacobin left, a minority but influential republican group in the Legislative Assembly, demanded the election by universal suffrage of a National Convention and the establishment of a Republic.

 


The Assault on the Tuileries Palace (August 10, 1792)

 

A threatening declaration by a Prussian general (crudely expressing the counterrevolutionary aims of the war) sparked a new uprising of the popular masses (the "sans-culottes") in Paris. On August 10, 1792, they stormed the Tuileries Palace, the king's residence, where documents proving his treason were found. The monarch was deposed and imprisoned.

The Republic: The Convention (1792-1795)

 

The fall of the monarchy was followed by the holding of elections (by universal male suffrage) and the constitution of the National Convention, whose launch coincided with the victory of French troops over the Prussians at Valmy (September 20, 1792). Two days later, on September 22, the National Convention proclaimed the Republic.

 

The struggle for power within the Convention between its left (Jacobins) and right (Girondins) wings reached one of its high points in the trial and execution of Louis XVI (January 21, 1793). In immediate response to the king's beheading, Austria, Prussia, Spain, the Netherlands, and England joined together in the First Coalition, an alliance with no other objective than to militarily end the revolutionary process. Faced with the advance of the First Coalition forces, counterrevolutionary conspiracies by the nobility and clergy, the outbreak of peasant revolt in the Vendée, wheat shortages, and widespread speculation, the moderate policies of the Girondins proved ineffective.

The Jacobins, with the support of the sans-culottes, took the reins of the Convention in June 1793. The French Revolution, closer than ever to the common people, radicalized. Attempts were made to develop the principles of social democracy (popular sovereignty, universal suffrage), reflected in a new constitution, which, however, never came into force.

 


Maximilian Robespierre

 

Dominated by the Jacobins, the Convention conferred exceptional powers on the executive institutions: the Committee of Public Safety decreed emergency measures (massive forced levies and price controls), and the Committee of General Security directed a repression against the enemies of the Revolution, which led to the guillotine of nobles, Girondin leaders, and Queen Marie Antoinette, as well as anyone who tried to evade conscription

. The Terror (1793-1794) had been established, a period dominated by Robespierre. Their drastic measures were effective: French troops halted the armies of the First Coalition, and internal rebellions were suppressed.

 

Once stability was achieved, the moderate bourgeoisie of the Convention considered it unjustified to maintain the state of emergency and, in July 1794, launched the so-called "Thermidor reaction": they withdrew their confidence in Robespierre (who was guillotined) and unleashed a "White Terror" against the leftists. The Convention drafted the Constitution of 1795, the legal framework for the new institutions in the next stage of the Republic, which is designated by the name of its executive branch: the Directory.

 

The Directory (1795-1799)

 

In October 1795, the Convention was dissolved and replaced by two chambers, the Council of Elders and the Council of Five Hundred, elected by census suffrage. Executive power was held by the five members of the Directory, each of whom could be renewed annually. Dominated by the conservative bourgeoisie, the Directory relied on the army to suppress popular revolts when the abolition of price controls made basic goods more expensive again, and also to crush conspiracies and insurrections promoted by both royalists (who aspired to restore monarchical absolutism) and the radical left.

 

While abroad, French generals (among whom the young Napoleon stood out) led successful military campaigns that culminated in the defeat of the First Coalition in 1797, the Directory proved incapable of Maintaining internal stability was not possible, not even within the republican institutions themselves, which were victims of internal struggles between various factions. Census suffrage did not prevent the Jacobin left and the royalists from enjoying considerable representation in the legislature; this threat was compounded, in December 1798, by the formation of a Second European Coalition against revolutionary France.

 

The prevailing anarchy and the weakness of the regime led the bourgeoisie and key leaders to favor a military solution; finally, with the support of one of the directors, Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, and other high-ranking officials, Napoleon Bonaparte led the coup d'état of 18 Brumaire (November 9, 1799). The French Revolution was over: the Directory was replaced by a new authoritarian regime, the Consulate (1799-1804), headed by Napoleon himself as First Consul, invested with broad powers.




Marie Antoinette


Louis 16

 


How to cite this article:

Tomás Fernández and Elena Tamaro. "Stages of the French Revolution [Summary]" [Internet]. Barcelona, Spain: Editorial Biografías y Vidas, 2004. Available at https://www.biografiasyvidas.com/historia/revolucion_francesa_resumen.htm [page consulted on July 31, 2025].

With affection,

Ruben

 

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

Niccolò Paganini

 

Niccolò Paganini



(born October 27, 1782, Genoa, republic of Genoa [Italy]—died May 27, 1840, Nice, France) was an Italian composer and principal violin virtuoso of the 19th century. A popular idol, he inspired the Romantic mystique of the virtuoso and revolutionized violin technique.

This article was most recently revised and updated by Encyclopaedia Britannica.

 

After initial study with his father, Paganini studied with a local violinist, G. Servetto, and then with the celebrated Giacomo Costa. He made his first appearance in 1793 and then studied with Alessandro Rolla and Gaspare Ghiretti at Parma. In 1797, accompanied by his father, he toured Lombardy, where with each concert his reputation grew. Gaining his independence soon after, he indulged excessively in gambling and romantic love affairs. At one point he pawned his violin because of gambling debts; a French merchant lent him a Guarneri violin to play a concert and, after hearing him, gave him the instrument.

 

Between 1801 and 1807 he wrote the 24 Capricci for unaccompanied violin, displaying the novel features of his technique, and the two sets of six sonatas for violin and guitar. He reappeared in Italy as a violinist in 1805 and was appointed director of music at Piombino by Napoleon’s sister, Élisa Bonaparte Baciocchi. He later gave recitals of his own compositions in many towns in Italy and about 1824 formed his long attachment with the singer Antonia Bianchi.

Quick Facts

Born: October 27, 1782, Genoa, republic of Genoa [Italy]

Died: May 27, 1840, Nice, France (aged 57)

Notable Works: “La campanella”

Niccolò Paganini (born October 27, 1782, Genoa, republic of Genoa [Italy]—died May 27, 1840, Nice, France) was an Italian composer and principal violin virtuoso of the 19th century. A popular idol, he inspired the Romantic mystique of the virtuoso and revolutionized violin technique.

 

After initial study with his father, Paganini studied with a local violinist, G. Servetto, and then with the celebrated Giacomo Costa. He made his first appearance in 1793 and then studied with Alessandro Rolla and Gaspare Ghiretti at Parma. In 1797, accompanied by his father, he toured Lombardy, where with each concert his reputation grew. Gaining his independence soon after, he indulged excessively in gambling and romantic love affairs. At one point he pawned his violin because of gambling debts; a French merchant lent him a Guarneri violin to play a concert and, after hearing him, gave him the instrument.

 

Between 1801 and 1807 he wrote the 24 Capricci for unaccompanied violin, displaying the novel features of his technique, and the two sets of six sonatas for violin and guitar. He reappeared in Italy as a violinist in 1805 and was appointed director of music at Piombino by Napoleon’s sister, Élisa Bonaparte Baciocchi. He later gave recitals of his own compositions in many towns in Italy and about 1824 formed his long attachment with the singer Antonia Bianchi.

In 1828 Paganini experienced great success in Vienna, and his appearances in Paris and London in 1831 were equally sensational. His tour of England and Scotland in 1832 made him a wealthy man. In 1833 he settled in Paris, where he commissioned Hector Berlioz to write his symphony Harold en Italie. Paganini thought that the challenge of its viola solo was too slight, however, and he never played it. Following the failure of the Casino Paganini, a gambling house in which he had invested, he went to Marseille in 1839, then to Nice.

 

Paganini’s romantic personality and adventures created in his own day the legend of a Mephistophelean figure. Stories circulated that he was in league with the devil and that he had been imprisoned for murder; his burial in consecrated ground was delayed for five years. He was long regarded as a miser, but a more accurate portrait would consider his desire to be free from a train of dependent followers and their importunities for his largesse. His gift of 20,000 francs to the struggling composer Berlioz was an act of generosity seemingly uncharacteristic; possibly Paganini, recognizing in “Beethoven’s successor” a worthy talent, thought it was his duty to come to the composer’s aid.



 

His violin technique, based on that of his works, principally the Capricci, the violin concertos, and the sets of variations, demanded a wide use of harmonics and pizzicato effects, new methods of fingering and even of tuning. In performance he improvised brilliantly. He was also a flamboyant showman who used trick effects such as severing one or two violin strings and continuing the piece on the remaining strings. His technical innovations were imitated by later virtuosi, notably Pablo Sarasate and Eugène Ysaÿe. His other works include 6 violin concertos, of which the first, in D major, is especially popular; 12 sonatas for violin and guitar; and 6 quartets for violin, viola, cello, and guitar. The influence of his virtuosity extended to orchestral as well as to piano music. His influence on Franz Liszt was immense. Themes from the Capricci inspired works by Liszt, Robert Schumann, Johannes Brahms, and Sergey Rachmaninoff.

With affection,

Ruben

 

Thursday, June 26, 2025

Strait of Hormuz

 

Strait of Hormuz


Satellite image

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Strait of Hormuz

The Strait of Hormuz (/hɔːrˈmuːz/ Persian: تنگهٔ هُرمُز Tangeh-ye Hormoz listen, Arabic: مَضيق هُرمُز Maīq Hurmuz) is a strait between the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. It provides the Only sea passage from the Persian Gulf to the open ocean and is one of the world's most strategically important choke points.[1] On the north coast lies Iran, and on the south coast lies the Musandam Peninsula, shared by the United Arab Emirates and the Musandam Governorate, an exclave of Oman. The Strait is about 104 miles (90 nmi; 167 km) long, with a width varying from about 60 mi (52 nmi; 97 km) to 24 mi (21 nmi; 39 km).[2][3]

 


Strait ofHormuz


Flag Iran


Flag Oman

As of 2023, 20% of the world's liquefied natural gas and 25% of seaborne oil trade passes

 through the Strait, making it a highly important location for trade.[4][3] It has been so for centuries; its vast hinterlands were rich in luxury trade goods with no easy access to lucrative trading ports. Babur's memoirs recount how almonds had to be carried from the distant Ferghana region to Hormuz, to reach markets.[5]

 

As of June 2025, the Strait has never been closed during Middle East conflicts, unlike the Straits of Tiran.[6]

 

The Strait separates Iran to the north and the Musandam Governorate of Oman and the United Arab Emirates to the south. (1892 map)

Etymology

The strait of Hormuz may have been named after Ifera Hurmiz, the mother of King Shapur II of Persia, who ruled between 309 and 379 AD.

 

The opening to the Persian Gulf was described, but not given a name, in the Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, a 1st-century mariner's guide:

 

At the upper end of these Calaei islands is a range of mountains called Calon, and there follows not far beyond, the mouth of the Persian Gulf, where there is much diving for the pearl-mussel. To the left of the straits are great mountains called Asabon and to the right there rises in full view another round and High Mountain called Semiramis; between them the passage across the strait is about six hundred stadia; beyond which that very great and broad sea, the Persian Gulf, reaches far into the interior. At the upper end of this gulf, there is a market town designated by law called Apologus, situated near Charaex Spasini and the River Euphrates.

 


The Strait as seen from an airliner at 35,000 feet (10,668 m). Musandam is in the foreground.

Periplus of the Erythraean Sea

In the 10th–17th centuries AD, the Kingdom of Ormus, which seems to have given the strait its name, was located here. Scholars, historians and linguists derive the name "Ormuz" from the local Persian word هورمغ Hur-mogh meaning date palm.[7] The resemblance of this word to the name of the Zoroastrian god هرمز Hormoz (a variant of Ahura Mazda) has resulted in the belief[citation needed] that these words are related.

 

Navigation

To reduce the risk of collision, ships moving through the Strait follow a traffic separation scheme (TSS): inbound ships use one lane, outbound ships another, each lane being two miles wide. The lanes are separated by a two-mile-wide "median".[8]

 

To traverse the Strait, ships pass through the territorial waters of Iran and Oman under the transit passage provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.[9] Although not all countries have ratified the convention,[10] most countries, including the U.S.,[11] accept these customary navigation rules as codified in the convention.

 

In 1959 Iran altered the legal status of the strait by expanding its territorial sea to 12 nmi (22 km) and declaring it would recognize only transit by innocent passage through the newly expanded area.[12] In 1972, Oman also expanded its territorial sea to 12 nmi (22 km) by decree.[12] Thus, by 1972, the Strait of Hormuz was completely "closed" by the combined territorial waters of Iran and Oman. During the 1970s, neither Iran or Oman attempted to impede the passage of warships, but in the 1980s, both countries asserted claims that were different from customary (old) law. Upon ratifying UNCLOS in 1989, Oman submitted declarations confirming its 1981 royal decree that only innocent passage is permitted through its territorial sea. The declarations further asserted that prior permission was required before foreign warships could pass through Omani territorial waters.[12] Upon signing the convention in 1982, Iran entered a declaration stating "that only states parties to the Law of the Sea Convention shall be entitled to benefit from the contractual rights created therein", including "the right of transit passage through straits used for international navigation". In 1993, Iran enacted a comprehensive law on maritime areas, provisions of which conflict with UNCLOS provisions, including a requirement that warships, submarines, and nuclear-powered ships obtain permission before exercising innocent passage through Iran's territorial waters. The US does not recognize any of the claims by Oman and Iran and has contested each of them.[12]

 

Oman has a radar site Link Quality Indicator (LQIto monitor the TSS in the Strait. This site is on a small island on the peak of Musandam Governorate

 

Oil trade flow



 

Oil trade through the strait by origin and destination, 2014–18

As of 2023, 20% of the world's liquefied natural gas and 25% of seaborne oil trade passes through the Strait, making it a highly important location for trade.

 

According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, in 2011, an average of 14 tankers per day passed out of the Persian Gulf through the Strait carrying 17 million barrels (2,700,000 m3) of crude oil. More than 85% of these crude oil exports went to Asian markets, with Japan, India, South Korea and China the largest destinations.[9] In 2018, 21 million barrels a day passed through the Strait, worth $1.2 billion at 2019 prices.

 

Events

Tanker War

The Tanker War phase of the Iran–Iraq War started when Iraq attacked the oil terminal and oil tankers at Iran's Kharg Island in early 1984.[14][15] Saddam Hussein's aim in attacking Iranian shipping was, among other things, to provoke the Iranians to retaliate with extreme measures, such as closing the Strait of Hormuz to all maritime traffic, thereby bringing American intervention.[14] Iran limited the retaliatory attacks to Iraqi shipping, leaving the strait open.[14]

 

Operation Praying Mantis

Operation Praying Mantis was an attack on 18 April 1988 by the United States Armed Forces within Iranian territorial waters in retaliation for the Iranian naval mining of international waters in the Persian Gulf during the Iran–Iraq War and the subsequent damage to an American warship. The U.S. Navy attacked with several groups of surface warships, plus aircraft from the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise, and her cruiser escort, USS Truxtun. The attack began with coordinated strikes by two surface groups.

 

Downing of Iran Air 655

On 3 July 1988, 290 people were killed when an Iran Air Airbus A300 was shot down over the strait by the United States Navy guided missile cruiser USS Vincennes (CG-49) when it was wrongly identified as a jet fighter.

 

Collisions

 USS Hartford and USS New Orleans collision

In January 2007, the nuclear submarine USS Newport News, struck MV Mogamigawa, a 300,000-ton Japanese-flagged crude tanker, south of the strait.[16] There were no injuries, and no oil leaked. On 20 March 2009, United States Navy Los Angeles-class submarine USS Hartford collided with the San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock USS New Orleans in the strait. The collision ruptured a fuel tank aboard New Orleans, spilling 25,000 US gallons (95 m3) of marine diesel fuel.

 

Iranian navy problems

In May 2020, Iran launched missiles at one of their own ships in a friendly fire accident, killing 19 sailors.[18] On 2 June 2021, the IRIS Kharg, a modified Ol-class replenishment oiler of the Iran Navy, sank in the Strait of Hormuz after catching fire. It was the navy's largest vessel.

 

On 4 January 2021, the Tasnim News Agency reported that a South Korea-flagged oil vessel headed from Saudi Arabia to the United Arab Emirates was seized for allegedly causing pollution violations. The ship was said to be carrying roughly 7,000 tons of ethanol. South Korea refused to comment on the accusation of causing oil pollution in the Strait of Hormuz. The ship, Hankuk Chemi, was headed to the UAE port Fujairah after loading oil from Jubail, Saudi Arabia on 2 January 2021, as per ship-tracking data gathered by Bloomberg.[22]

 

 

US–Iran disputes, threats to close the Strait


The guided-missile destroyer USS Porter transits the Strait of Hormuz in May 2012. Porter is deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet

2008

Naval stand-offs between Iranian speedboats and US warships in the Strait occurred in December 2007 and January 2008. U.S. officials accused Iran of harassing and provoking their naval vessels, but Iran denied the allegations. On 14 January, U.S. Navy officials appeared to contradict the Pentagon version of the 16 January event, in which the Pentagon had reported that U.S. vessels had almost fired on approaching Iranian boats. The Navy's regional commander, Vice Admiral Kevin Cosgriff, said the Iranians had "neither anti-ship missiles nor torpedoes" and he "wouldn't characterize the posture of the US 5th Fleet as afraid of these small boats".[26] On 29 June, the commander of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, Mohammad Ali Jafari, said that if either Israel or the US attacked Iran, it would seal off the Strait to wreak havoc in the oil markets. Cosgriff warned that such Iranian action would be considered an act of war, and the U.S. would not allow Iran to hold hostage a third of the world's oil supply.[27] On 8 July, Ali Shirazi, a mid-level clerical aide to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was quoted telling the Revolutionary Guards, "The Zionist regime is pressuring White House officials to attack Iran. If they commit such a stupidity, Tel Aviv and U.S. shipping in the Persian Gulf will be Iran's first targets and they will be burned."[28]

 

In the last week of July, in Operation Brimstone,[29] dozens of US, and naval ships from other countries, came to undertake joint exercises for possible military activity in the shallow waters off the coast of Iran. By 11 August, more than 40 U.S. and allied ships were en route to the Strait.[30]

 

2011–12

2012 Strait of Hormuz dispute

On 27 December 2011, Iranian Vice President Mohammad Reza Rahimi threatened to cut off oil supply from the strait should economic sanctions limit, or cut off, Iranian oil exports.[31] A US Fifth Fleet spokeswoman said the Fleet was "always ready to counter malevolent actions", whilst Admiral Habibollah Sayyari of the Iran Navy claimed cutting off oil shipments would be "easy".[32] Despite an initial 2% rise in oil prices, markets ultimately did not react significantly to Iran's threat, with oil analyst Thorbjoern Bak Jensen concluding "they cannot stop the flow for a longer period due to the amount of U.S. hardware in the area".[33]

 

 


The guided-missile destroyer USS Porter transits the Strait of Hormuz in May 2012. Porter is deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet

On 3 January 2012, Iran threatened to take action if the U.S. Navy moved an aircraft carrier back into the Persian Gulf. Iranian Army chief Ataollah Salehi said the US had moved a carrier out of the Persian Gulf because of Iran's naval exercises, and Iran would take action if the ship returned. "Iran will not repeat its warning...the enemy's carrier has been moved to the Gulf of Oman because of our drill. I recommend and emphasize to the American carrier not to return to the Persian Gulf", he said.[34] U.S. Navy spokesman Commander Bill Speaks responded that deployment of U.S. military assets would continue as has been the custom stating: "The U.S. Navy operates under international maritime conventions to maintain a constant state of high vigilance in order to ensure the continued, safe flow of maritime traffic in waterways critical to global commerce."[35] While earlier statements from Iran had little effect on oil markets, coupled with new sanctions, later comments drove crude futures higher, up over 4%. Pressure on prices reflected a combination of uncertainty driven further by China's response – reducing oil January 2012 purchases from Iran by 50% compared to 2011

 

By January 2012, U.S.-led sanctions began to show economic effects, as the Iranian currency lost 12% of its value. Further pressure on Iranian currency was added by

 

On 9 January 2012, Iranian Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi denied that Iran had ever claimed it would close the Strait, saying, "Iran is the most important provider of security in the Strait... if one threatens the security of the Persian Gulf, then all are threatened."[37] Iran's Foreign Ministry confirmed on 16 January it had received a letter from the US. Authorities were considering whether to reply, although the contents of the letter were not divulged.[38] The US had previously announced its intention to warn Iran that closing the Strait is a "red line" that would provoke an American response.[39] Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the US would "take action and re-open the Strait", which could be accomplished only by military means, including minesweepers, warship escorts and potentially airstrikes. Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta told troops that the US would not tolerate Iran closing the Strait. Nevertheless, Iran continued to discuss the impact of shutting the Strait on oil markets, saying any disruption of supply would cause a shock "no country" could manage

 

 

, seven British warships, including the destroyer HMS Daring and 4 Type 23 frigates, and a French warship, frigate La Mottons rose further after the European Union imposed sanctions on Iranian oil.  

 

2018 and 2019

In July 2018, Iran again made threats to close the Strait, citing looming American sanctions after the U.S. withdrew from the JCPOA deal.[46] In August, Iran test-fired a ballistic missile. According to the officials, the anti-ship Fateh-110 Mod 3 flew over 100 miles on a flight path over the Strait to a test range in the Iranian desert. "It was shore-to-shore", said a U.S. official.[47]

 

On 22 April 2019, the U.S. ended the oil waivers, which had allowed some of Iran's customers to import Iranian oil, without risking financial penalties as part of U.S. economic sanctions. Aljazeera quoted Major-General Mohammad Bagheri of the Iranian Armed Forces, stating "We are not after closing the Strait of Hormuz but if the hostility of the enemies increases, we will be able to do so...[48] If our oil does not pass, the oil of others shall not pass the Strait of Hormuz either".[49]

 

2019 attacks on oil tankers

Iran has persistently attacked vessels and seized ships amidst political issues.[25][50] On 13 June 2019, the oil tankers Front Altair and Kokuka Courageous were rocked by explosions shortly before dawn, the crew of the latter reported seeing a flying object strike the ship; the crew were rescued by the destroyer USS Bainbridge while the crew of the Front Altair were rescued by Iranian ships.

In July 2019, a Stena Bulk Tanker, Stena Impero, sailing under a British flag, was boarded and captured by Iranian forces. The spokesman for Iran's Guardian Council, Abbas Ali Kadkhodaei, was quoted as describing the seizure as a "reciprocal action". This was presumed to be in reference to the seizure of an Iranian tanker, Grace 1, bound for Syria in Gibraltar a few days prior.

 

In 2020, France deployed about 600 troops at sea and in the air under the CTF474 to protect maritime trade, regional business, and to ease local tensions. Since the first week of April 2020, the operation combines the Dutch frigate Ruyter, the French frigate Forbin, and one French airplane ATLANTIC2 (ATL2).

 

2025

On 14 June, Iran reportedly issued a threat to block the Strait in response to Israeli attacks targeting its military and nuclear infrastructure. The Financial Times reported that such action could cause oil prices to surge beyond the recent 7–14% increases, possibly exceeding $100 to $150 per barrel.[57] This would likely fuel global inflation and contribute to an economic downturn. Analysts emphasized the vulnerability of regional exporters, noting that "Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq and Iran are wholly locked into one tiny passage for exports." The Strait handles 18-19 million barrels per day, nearly 20% of global oil consumption, including crude, condensates, and fuel.[58][59] Analysts have warned that Iran could suffer severe consequences from any attempt to block the Strait. "Iran's economy heavily relies on the free passage of goods and vessels through the seaway, as its oil exports are entirely sea-based," analysts from JP Morgan explained. Closing the Strait could strain Iran’s crucial energy trade with China, its only major oil customer U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio also warned Iran against attempting to shut down the Strait, stating that such a move would be "economic suicide" for the Islamic Republic, as the waterway is vital for its exports.[61] On 17 June, two oil tankers collided in the Strait, though reports did not suggest that this was a security-related incident. The vessels involved were the Front Eagle, carrying crude oil from Iraq to China, and the Adalynn, which was unladen and en route to the Suez Canal. Both caught fire on deck, but no oil spill occurred. All crew members aboard the Adalynn were safely evacuated by the UAE coast guard.

 

After the United States strikes on Iranian nuclear sites on 22 June, the Iranian Parliament voted to close the Strait. A final decision rests with Iran’s Supreme National Security Council.[65] Revolutionary Guards commander Esmaeil Kousari confirmed that shutting the Strait would be executed "whenever necessary", to protect national sovereignty and deter further foreign aggression. The potential closure of the Strait, through which 20% of the world’s oil supply transits, would significantly disrupt global energy markets. Such a move could cause oil prices to increase and risk destabilizing the global economy, given the Strait's critical role as a maritime chokepoint for crude oil, liquefied natural gas, and other petroleum products.[68] On 23 June 2025, oil prices were below $70 again (7% lower than on June 20), indicating that the oil market viewed the US strikes, and Iran's response (the Strait remaining open, and 2025 Iranian strikes on Al Udeid Air Base), as inconsequential.

 

Ability of Iran to hinder shipping

Millennium Challenge 2002 was a major war game exercise conducted by US armed forces in 2002. It simulated an attempt by a country (likely to be Iran) to close the Strait. The assumptions and results were controversial. Iran's simulated strategy beat the materially superior US armed forces.

 

A 2008 article in International Security contended that Iran could seal off or impede traffic in the Strait for a month, and an attempt by the U.S. to reopen it would be likely to escalate the conflict.[71] In a later issue, however, the journal published a response which questioned key assumptions and suggested a much shorter timeline for re-opening.

 

In December 2011, Iran's Navy began a ten-day exercise in international waters along the Strait. Iranian Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari stated that the Strait would not be closed during the exercise; Iranian forces could easily accomplish that but such a decision must be made at a political level Captain John Kirby, a Pentagon spokesman, was quoted in December 2011 saying: "Efforts to increase tension in that part of the world are unhelpful and counter-productive. For our part, we are comfortable that we have in the region sufficient capabilities to honor our commitments to our friends and partners, as well as the international community." Suzanne Maloney, an expert at the Brookings Institution, said, "The expectation is that the U.S. military could address any Iranian threat relatively quickly."[75] General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in 2012 that Iran "has invested in capabilities that could, in fact, for a period of time block the Strait of Hormuz." He stated, "We've invested in capabilities to ensure that if that happens, we can defeat that."

 

A May 2012 article by Nilufer Oral, a Turkish researcher of maritime law, concludes that both the UNCLOS and the 1958 Convention on the High Seas would be violated if Iran followed through on its threat to block passage of vessels such as oil tankers, and that the act of passage is not related in law to the imposition of economic sanctions. The article further asserts that a coastal state may prevent "transit or non-suspendable innocent passage" only if: 1) there is threatened or actual use of force, occurring during passage, against the sovereignty, territorial integrity, or political independence of a state bordering the strait; or 2) the vessel in any other way violates the principles of international law as embodied in the Charter of the United Nations.

 

As of 2013, the treaty had been ratified by 63 states, including most NATO-bloc and Soviet-bloc nations but with the notable exceptions of most of the OPEC and Arab League nations like Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Iran, as well as China, North Korea, and South Korea.[78]

 

Alternative shipping routes

 

Map of the Habshan–Fujairah oil pipeline and the East-West Crude Oil Pipeline

In June 2012, Saudi Arabia reopened the Iraq Pipeline through Saudi Arabia (IPSA), which was confiscated from Iraq in 2001 and travels from Iraq across Saudi Arabia to a Red Sea port. It will have a capacity of 1.65 million barrels (262,000 m3) per day.

 

In July 2012, the UAE began using the new Habshan–Fujairah oil pipeline from the Habshan fields in Abu Dhabi to the Fujairah oil terminal on the Gulf of Oman, effectively bypassing the Strait of Hormuz. It has a maximum capacity of around 2 million barrels (320,000 m3) per day, over three-quarters of the UAE's 2012 production rate. The UAE is also increasing Fujairah's storage and off-loading capacities.[79][80] The UAE is building the world's largest crude oil storage facility in Fujairah with a capacity of holding 14 million barrels (2,200,000 m3) to enhance Fujairah's growth as a global oil and trading hub.[81] The Habshan – Fujairah route secures the UAE's energy security and has the advantage of being a ground oil pipeline transportation which is considered the cheapest form of oil transportation and also reduces insurance costs as oil tankers would no longer enter the Persian Gulf.

 

In a July 2012 Foreign Policy article, Gal Luft compared Iran and the Strait of Hormuz to the Ottoman Empire and the Dardanelles, a choke point for shipments of Russian grain a century ago. He indicated that tensions involving the Strait of Hormuz are leading those currently dependent on shipments from the Persian Gulf to find alternative shipping capabilities. He stated that Saudi Arabia was considering building new pipelines to Oman and Yemen, and that Iraq might revive the disused Iraq–Syria pipeline to transport crude oil to the Mediterranean. Luft stated that reducing Hormuz traffic "presents the West with a new opportunity to augment its current Iran containment strategy."



With affection,

Ruben